Hello Reader,
It's Sunday and time for another challenge of your forensic muscle. If you watched the Forensic Lunch this week you got to hear us talk about a range of legal issues revolving around when non law enforcement personnel start blurring their rules in trying to help. In this weeks challenge let's see your research skills and search-fu.
The Prize:
It's Sunday and time for another challenge of your forensic muscle. If you watched the Forensic Lunch this week you got to hear us talk about a range of legal issues revolving around when non law enforcement personnel start blurring their rules in trying to help. In this weeks challenge let's see your research skills and search-fu.
The Prize:
A $200 Amazon Gift Card
The Rules:
- You must post your answer before Monday 5/5/14 10AM CST (GMT -5)
- The most complete answer wins
- You are allowed to edit your answer after posting
- If two answers are too similar for one to win, the one with the earlier posting time wins
- Be specific and be thoughtful
- Anonymous entries are allowed, please email them to dcowen@g-cpartners.com. Please state in your email if you would like to be anonymous or not if you win.
- In order for an anonymous winner to receive a prize they must give their name to me, but i will not release it in a blog post
The Challenge:
One of our viewers, Jason Alvarado, pointed out a case study on USA v Jerrett in which a mans conviction was overturned when it was revealed how the anonymous tipster and the government interacted. What other case studies can you find for other cases like this in the USA or in any other country.
Also Read: Daily Blog #314
Post a Comment